Category: 23 good reasons

  • Encouraging autonomy

    Encouraging autonomy

    Today’s article is written by Paul Stacey

    Paul Stacey works globally in higher education strategically enabling and connecting open education with open science, and other forms of open. Paul has deep experience in open through his work at Creative Commons and as executive director for five years of Open Education Global. He now works independently as an open researcher and consultant at https://paulstacey.global.

    As humans we have an urge to lead our own lives, make our own decisions, develop ourselves as we see fit. Yet we live in a social context with others. Full individual autonomy is counterbalanced by equal autonomy of others. Directing our own lives inevitably entails accommodating others. The freedom to lead our own life involves choosing between different courses of action as defined by oneself and others.

    Autonomy is the state of mind that makes our choices meaningful. We’re autonomous when we have enough understanding and self-awareness to be able to make choices that align with our values and genuine interests.  We’re autonomous when we know enough (about the world, and about ourselves) to be able to not follow the crowd unless it’s going where we want to go. When our autonomy is low, our choices are more likely to be whimsical, biased, ill-informed, or just “because everyone else is doing it;” and more likely to be self-destructive. When our autonomy is high, we’re more likely to make choices we’ll never regret, choices we can be proud of. Autonomy, therefore, liberates us to be our best selves. (Nicholas Alchin, Student Choices, Student Autonomy, and Student Agency: What are the Relationships?, 2021)

    We have an innate drive for knowledge, to improve our skills to advance our understanding. Fuelled by curiosity we explore the world and learn from it. The extent to which we can take charge of our own learning represents our learning autonomy.

    Learning occurs in a social context shaped by history, heritage, culture, language, customs, rules, laws and other external forces. Our social context can take many forms, a friend network, a club, a team, a school, a city, a nation. These social groups take on their own autonomy based on the individuals involved coming together and working toward a common end. This collective action, in the service of something larger than the individual, is achieved by creating mutually beneficial interdependencies within a larger social network. Individual autonomy and social autonomy come together in a way that creates a sense of connectedness, community, and belonging.

    Autonomy in education involves empowering students, teachers, and schools to have choices and make decisions. Autonomy generates greater engagement, motivation, better learning experiences and more efficient use of resources. Student autonomy, teacher autonomy, and institutional autonomy are all interrelated and are all affected by external controls. Our society sets academic standards. Programs of study specify scope and sequence. Rates of learning and dates for learning are predefined. Schools are created as places of learning. Education is increasingly centralised, regulatory and marketized. These external forces influence and shape our individual learning autonomy. They affect the extent to which we can direct our own learning. They affect the control we have over what we learn, where we learn, and how we learn.  

    One of the unique propositions of open education is that it encourages autonomy for learners, educators and institutions.

    • Students: 

    For students open education offers immediate no, or low cost, access to education materials and resources. Open educational resources can be retained by students for life giving students the autonomy to engage in lifelong learning by referencing materials on an ongoing basis whenever needed. Open educational resources can be adapted, translated, localized and continuously improved enabling students to customize and personalize their own learning.

    And open education goes well beyond simply teaching and learning materials. Open education pedagogies give learners greater agency over their own learning. Instead of passive lectures, learners may co-create teaching and learning materials with the instructor, producing knowledge that will then be used by all those who come after them. They may engage in assignments that generate local or global public goods making their learning publicly visible and contributing in real ways to social needs. In higher education open education utilizes open research and open research data enabling learners to gain a literacy and understanding of what it means to be a researcher and to see how open accelerates the advancement of knowledge.

    • Educators: 

    For educators open education provides greater choice. Teachers can develop and customize curricula to match their own understanding of a domain. They can create materials in their own language, localized to their own social context. Open education, like research, is openly shared enabling educators to learn from their professional peers and use the best materials available from across their domain. Open education turns the creation of learning materials from a solo effort into a team effort. In a profession frequently constrained by time it is helpful to reduce redundant effort and instead participate in mutually beneficial producing, sharing and stewarding of teaching and learning materials. In this context autonomy is not independence or just being left alone. The greater autonomy of open education brings with it greater accountability, including responsibility to contribute to the body of professional knowledge. Open education encourages the autonomy of educators by giving them more control, and responsibility, for knowledge production and opportunities to innovate teaching and learning, finding new ways to make learning meaningful and engaging for students.

    • Institutions: 

    For institutions open education provides the autonomy to better manage their own education systems and processes. Open education shifts the locus of control from external agencies to internal ones giving institutions greater resiliency to handle crises and self govern. The principles that underlie open education align with institution mission and vision statements particularly around providing access to education, making education affordable, providing equal opportunity, and greater inclusion. In addition, open education increases the social relevance of knowledge and research by increasing public engagement and connection with society.

    At a time of high interest in sovereignty, open education provides a means for having choice and reclaiming control over the resources, methods, and systems that shape education. 

    Open education is only one of many forms of open in higher education. It is part of a broader spectrum of opens including open research, open science, open access,open data, open innovation, open hardware, open source, and open governance. Each open provides additional autonomy. Combining them together creates a synergistic effect that maximizes autonomy for the good of all involved.

    Encouraging autonomy

    ” by Paul Stacey is licensed under CC BY 4.0

  • Respond fast to tech challenges

    Respond fast to tech challenges

    Respond fast to tech challenges

    ” by Belén García-Manrubia is licensed under CC BY 4.0

  • Access to varied knowledge

    Access to varied knowledge

    Access to varied knowledge

    ” by Sophie Depoterre & Yves Deville is licensed under CC BY 4.0

  • Promote Quality

    Promote Quality

    Promote Quality

    ” by Magdalena Spaude is licensed under CC BY 4.0

  • Translation and localisation 

    Translation and localisation 

    Open education enables linguistic and cultural diversity

    Today’s article is written by Glenda Cox

    Associate Professor Glenda Cox works in the Centre for Innovation in Learning and Teaching (CILT: http://www.cilt.uct.ac.za/) at the University of Cape Town and her portfolio includes postgraduate teaching, Curriculum change projects, Open Education, and Staff development.

    She holds the UNESCO chair in Open Education and Social Justice (2021-2025) and is a member of the UNITWIN network on Open Education (2024-2028). She is also Vice president of the Board of Open Education global organisation.
    She is passionate about the role of Open Education in the changing the world of Higher Education.

    Open education researchers and advocates have consistently worked towards building quality education for all. This priority remains crucial and currently, the hype of AI has diverted attention from meeting students’ educational needs. It’s time to recentre on the fundamental principles and powerful affordances of open education.

    Open education plays a key role in addressing social injustice. Nancy Fraser (2005) identifies three interconnected dimensions of justice: economic (distribution of resources), cultural (recognition of different identities and groups), and political (representation of participation and voice). Research in open education has focused on cost-saving and equity of access to materials. Recently, the emphasis has shifted to the multiple affordances of open education to remedy cultural and political injustices.

    This blog focuses on cultural recognition through translation and localisation of open education. Cultural misrecognition is a globally pervasive form of injustice. Nancy Fraser refers to it as the devaluing of cultural values. A just response includes recognizing and valuing people’s attributes and their ways of being in, understanding, and acting upon the world.

    Image by: Pietro Soldi https://thegreats.co/artists/pietro-soldi. Published under Creative Commons-Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-SA).

    • Translation: 

    There is evidence of the dominance of the English language in higher education globally (Doiz et al. 2013). Many students enter higher education with English as a second or third language, facing challenges in mastering the language while adapting to a new culture. One remedy is translating key concepts in existing open textbooks. With the rise of automatic translation tools and large language models, these tools can support the use of multiple languages in open education, Open Science (UNESCO 2021), and Open Access. However, efforts to reach the world’s more than 7000 languages remain a distant dream (Bowker, 2024). Meta AI’s project No Language Left Behind aims to support 200 languages (Costa-Jussà et al. 2022). English remains the target language, placing the responsibility for translation on non-Anglophone scholars, while English-speaking scholars remain privileged (Bowker, 2024).

    • Localisation, Curriculum Transformation, and Decolonisation: 

    In addition to translating materials, it is fundamental for students to have epistemological access through inclusive pedagogies and curriculum change. Epistemological access moves beyond physical or formal access to meaningful access to university resources. Faculty need to understand their student cohort’s needs, as there is no one-size-fits-all approach. Open textbook authors at the University of Cape Town describe localisation as contextualising teaching and loosening the grip of European and American perspectives. Relevance includes local case studies representing students’ lived experiences. Curriculum transformation involves updating courses and materials to reflect new forms of thought, ensuring the teaching body reflects the student body.

    • Decolonisation:

     A conversation about curriculum transformation must include decolonisation. The decolonial discussion is prominent in many higher education institutions, especially in previously colonised countries. Hölscher, Zembylas, and Bozalek (2020) highlight two key aspects of decolonisation: resisting Eurocentrism and acknowledging the contributions of colonised populations, and righting the wrongs of colonial domination with an ethical stance towards justice for those affected by persistent forms of coloniality. Open education provides just ways to teach, select, and produce content.

    • Conclusion:

    Open education has not resolved the economic and socio-political challenges facing universities and learners. However, for example, open textbooks enable open educational practitioners to take steps toward transforming the curriculum. Local, relevant, and accessible content is essential for redress. Open education provides a means to showcase cultural and linguistic diversity. The goal is for students to have course materials that are translated, locally sourced, and relevant to their lived realities.


    References

    Bowker, L., (2024) “Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication: How Far Can Technology Take Us and What Else Can We Do?”, The Journal of Electronic Publishing 27(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.6262

    Costa-jussà, Marta R., James Cross, Onur Çelebi, Maha Elbayad, Kenneth Heafield, Kevin Heffernan, Elahe Kalbassi, et al. 2022. No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.04672

    Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D. and  Sierra, J. (2013). Globalisation, internationalisation, multilingualism and linguistic strains in higher education. Studies in Higher Education [online], 38(9), pp. 1407–1421. Available from: https://doi10.1080/03075079.2011.642349 

    Fraser, N. (2005) Re-framing justice in a globalising world. New Left Review 36, 69–88. Available from:  https://newleftreview-org.ezproxy.uct.ac.za/issues/ii36/articles/nancy-fraser-reframing-justice-in-a-globalizing-world. 

    Hölscher,D., Zembylas,M., and Bozalek, V. (2020). “Neoliberalism, Coloniality and Nancy Fraser’s Contribution to the Decolonisation Debate in South African Higher Education: Concluding Thoughts,” in Nancy Fraser and Participatory Parity: Reframing Social Justice in South African Higher Education, ed. Vivienne Bozalek, Dorothee Hölscher and Michalinos Zembylas. London: Routledge. 

    UNESCO. 2021. Recommendation on Open Science. https://www.unesco.org/en/open-science/about

  • 23 good reasons… to adopt Open Education

    23 good reasons… to adopt Open Education

    Every year, in early March, Open Education is celebrated during the OE week, promoted by Open Education Global. This is an event where groups over the world promote ideas and projects from Open Education.

    With the help of our friends at the Unesco Chair RELIA and the EUniWell European University of Wellbeing, we thought it possible to contribute to this OE Week by re-examining the arguments we can use to convince people and institutions to go for Open Education.

    We then contacted friends from all continents and asked them if they would like to contribute by writing an article on just one of these arguments.

    There were several surprises for us in the hours following the launch of our call.

    An enthusiastic welcome

    The first surprise was that it was received with enthusiasm. Within 10 hours, all the original 22 topics had been selected.

    A good starting point

    The second surprise was that our original list was a good starting point. To be fair, it had been tested in the field: we had been running activities in different countries on the issue of adopting Open Education and the selection of topics had therefore gone through different rounds of practical testing. In fact, just one new proposal was made to us, which was excellent and justified that we would be talking about the 23 reasons.

    International contributions

    The third surprise was the variety: we have contributions proposed from 10 countries and in 5 languages. We are especially happy to have 7 contributions from UNOE partners.

    The teams in charge of the three blogs on which the articles will be initially published are really excited about this, even if they also are having to deal with some (expected) interesting difficulties, especially regarding the different ways to handle multilingualism.

    On our UNOE blog, each article will be available in at least 2 of the 4 official languages of the United Nations present in the network: English, French, Spanish, Arabic.

    23 articles but only 7 days a week!

    For our participation in the OE Week, we had imagined unveiling a “good reason” each day of the week. But with the 23 articles that we’re expecting, and a week only having 7 days, we’ve opted to go for an Open Education Month, in the spirit promoted by our friends from Quebec!

    All the material will be under a CC-BY licence, allowing general distribution. So, anyone who sees value in posting, reposting, transforming the posts is encouraged to contact us early so that we can help them.

    We hope this operation and the series of resulting articles will enrich our reflexion and also help UNOE appear as a legitimate actor of Open Education.

    Join us here in early March to explore 23 good reasons for Open Education throughout the month!